Just got done perusing the latest issue of the Journal of Finance . As is the typical case, 50% of the articles can be read if you have a PhD in math, but the other 50% are readable. Kinda.
Here is a really surprising one: Investment consultant recommendations are effectively worthless, on average.
Similar to the retail advisory space, the institutional consultant service providers likely add value via their role as a money doctor, not in their role as a “manager picker.”
Investment consultants advise institutional investors on their choice of fund manager. Focusing on U.S. actively managed equity funds, we analyze the factors that drive consultants’ recommendations, what impact these recommendations have on flows, and how well the recommended funds perform. We find that investment consultants’ recommendations of funds are driven largely by soft factors, rather than the funds’ past performance, and that their recommendations have a very significant effect on fund flows. However, we find no evidence that these recommendations add value, suggesting that the search for winners, encouraged and guided by investment consultants, is fruitless.
Here is the key table from the paper highlighting that the spread in performance between recommended and not-recommended funds is flat, and arguably negative if you equal-weight the recommendations.
- The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. Our full disclosures are available here. Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom).
- Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.
- This site provides NO information on our value ETFs or our momentum ETFs. Please refer to this site.