Art, Stamps, and Violins in Your Portfolio?

Art, Stamps, and Violins in Your Portfolio?

March 12, 2014 Research Insights
Print Friendly
(Last Updated On: January 18, 2017)

The Investment Performance of Art and Other Collectibles

Abstract:

We assess the long-term financial returns from high-quality collectible real assets, and review the unique risks that are associated with such investments. Over the period 1900-2012, art, stamps, and musical instruments (violins) have appreciated at an average annual rate of 6.4%-6.9% in nominal terms, or 2.4%-2.8% in real terms. Despite the similarity in long-term returns, short-term trends can vary substantially across these different types of emotional assets. Collectibles have enjoyed higher average returns than government bonds, bills, and gold. However, it is important to recognize the quantitative importance of transaction costs in collectibles markets. In addition, price volatility is larger than is suggested by conventional measures of risk, and these assets are also exposed to fluctuating tastes and potential frauds. Yet, despite the large costs and many pitfalls, investment in emotional assets can pay off, because of the non-financial yield they provide.

Data Sources:

1900-2012–long time series!

Alpha Highlight:

High volatility returns!

Investing_in_Emotional_Assets
The results are hypothetical results and are NOT an indicator of future results and do NOT represent returns that any investor actually attained. Indexes are unmanaged, do not reflect management or trading fees, and one cannot invest directly in an index. Additional information regarding the construction of these results is available upon request.

Strategy Summary:

  1. Paper first reviews the long-term investment performance of three important categories of “emotional assets”—stamps, art and musical instruments (violins) and compares with the performance of other financial assets (Equities, Bonds, Bills, Gold).
    • Table 1 reports returns from 1900-2012.
      • Collectibles had higher returns than bonds, bills and gold.
      • Annualized real returns from high to low: Equities: 5.2%, Stamps: 2.8%, Violins: 2.5%, Art: 2.4%, Bonds: 1.5%, Gold: 1.1%, Bills: 0.9%.
  2. Paper then discusses the costs and risks of investing in “emotional assets”.
    • High Costs:
      1. Transaction costs: can be as high as 25%, including auction house fees, dealer mark-ups, tax and so on. The impact of such costs on net annualized returns is inversely related to the holding period.
      2. Illiquidity: auction houses do not hold sales continuously, and searching for potential buyers can be time-consuming and costly.
      3. Other expenses: storage and insurance costs.
    • High Risks:
      1. Return volatility: Standard deviation tends to underestimate the true volatility of collectibles.
      2. Difficult to diversify risks, since it’s not affordable for most investors to buy a set of artworks.
      3. Changes in tastes and wealth pattern: Demand is hard to predict, since tastes and wealth distributions change over time.
      4. Other risks such as fads and bubbles, forgeries and frauds, and problems with indirect investment.

Strategy Commentary:

  • Without a large amount of capital, it may be difficult to build a diverse portfolio of emotional assets.
  • This market may be interesting to investors who already have a diversified portfolio of financial assets, who have a long investment horizon, and who can sit out periods of high illiquidity and low demand for luxury consumption.

Stamps, Art, and Musical Instruments–Who’s Ready to Add them to the Portfolio?


Note: This site provides NO information on our value investing ETFs or our momentum investing ETFs. Please refer to this site.


Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.


Please remember that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Please read our full disclosures. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. This material has been provided to you solely for information and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The factual information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed by the author and Alpha Architect to be reliable but it is not necessarily all-inclusive and is not guaranteed as to its accuracy and is not to be regarded as a representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor should the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission from Alpha Architect.


Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom)




About the Author

Wesley R. Gray, Ph.D.

After serving as a Captain in the United States Marine Corps, Dr. Gray earned a PhD, and worked as a finance professor at Drexel University. Dr. Gray’s interest in bridging the research gap between academia and industry led him to found Alpha Architect, an asset management that delivers affordable active exposures for tax-sensitive investors. Dr. Gray has published four books and a number of academic articles. Wes is a regular contributor to multiple industry outlets, to include the following: Wall Street Journal, Forbes, ETF.com, and the CFA Institute. Dr. Gray earned an MBA and a PhD in finance from the University of Chicago and graduated magna cum laude with a BS from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.