Flexible Asset Allocation
Generalized Momentum and Flexible Asset Allocation (FAA) An Heuristic Approach
- Wouter J. Keller and Hugo S.van Putten
- A recent version of the paper can be found here.
- Note: CXO Advisory has a recent post on this, but I was 90% done with this post so I’m posting anyway. CXO has a more detailed analysis for subscribers to their site.
In this paper we extend the timeseries momentum (or trendfollowing) model towards a generalized momentum model, called Flexible Asset Allocation (FAA). This is done by adding new momentum factors to the traditional momentum factor R based on the relative returns among assets. These new factors are called Absolute momentum (A), Volatility momentum (V) and Correlation momentum (C). Each asset is ranked on each of the four factors R, A, V and C. By using a linearised representation of a loss function representing risk/return, we are able to arrive at simple closed form solutions for our flexible asset allocation strategy based on these four factors. We demonstrate the generalized momentum model by using a 7 asset portfolio model, which we backtest from 1998-2012, both in- and out-of-sample.
- Test a few different signals for market and asset class timing. The authors then combine these signals. They are using 7 asset classes described here:
- Our example universe consists of 7 index funds (so U=7), i.e. 3 for global stocks (VTSMX, FDIVX, VEIEX) covering US, EAFE and EM regions, 2 for US bonds (VFISX, VBMFX) and a commodity and REIT index fund (QRAAX, VGSIX). Users only interested in recent years can use the corresponding ETFs (eg. VTI, VEA, VWO, SHY, BND, GSG, and VNQ) which follow the same indices as our index funds.
- They use a 4 month lookback for prices in the paper.
- Each month, rank all 7 based on relative momentum (higher is better), volatility (lower is better), and correlations (lower is better). So each of the seven assets has a rank from 1-7 for the 3 factors.
- Then rank using this equation:
- Li = wR * rank(ri) + wV * rank(vi) + wC * rank (ci)
- Authors arbitrarilly set wR=1, wV=0.5, and wC=0.5.
- This new variable “Li” now ranks all the assets on relative momentum, volatility, and correlations. Pick the top 3 assets each month and equal weight these.
- Last, for each of the top 3 assets chosen above, check their absolute momentum – if this is negative, just go into cash.
- Make money!
- Simple way to combine absolute momentum, relative momentum, volatility, and correlations.
- Paper also shows better returns when not equal weighting the top 3 assets, but this is more complicated.
- Cool paper…but one gripe…
Translation of the very obtuse abstract:
We mix momentum, risk parity, and correlation factors–factors all known to work in sample for tactical asset allocation models–and compile them into a model that tells us what we already know: these factors work historically. We forgot to include a test of our model against Meb Faber’s ridiculously easy long-term moving average rule as a benchmark comparison (instead opting to include the buy&hold benchmark, which sucks), because that would make all our complicated models seem worthless.
One paper you might want to explore if this sort of stuff turns you on is Gary Antonacci’s piece:
Note: This site provides NO information on our value investing ETFs or our momentum investing ETFs. Please refer to this site.
Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.
Please remember that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Please read our full disclosures. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. This material has been provided to you solely for information and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The factual information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed by the author and Alpha Architect to be reliable but it is not necessarily all-inclusive and is not guaranteed as to its accuracy and is not to be regarded as a representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor should the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission from Alpha Architect.
Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom)