Academic Research Insight: Factor Investing Over the Long Run
- Title: FACTOR BASED INVESTING: THE LONG TERM EVIDENCE
- Authors: ELROY DIMSON, PAUL MARSH, AND MIKE STAUNTON
- Publication: THE JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 2017, SPECIAL ISSUE (version here)
What are the research questions?
- Is there out-of-sample (OOS) evidence for factor investing?
What are the Academic Insights?
By studying a data set including 23 countries and over a long time frame (1926 for the US and 1955 for the UK and on average 43 years for other countries), the authors find:
- The concept of the size effect was introduced by Banz (1981) documenting a monthly 1% premium of small cap stocks compared to large cap stocks. The authors find a diminished premium: 0.32% monthly for the longest average period and 0.45% monthly from 2000 to 2016.
- The concept of the value effect was introduced by Rosenberg et al. (1985) documenting a yearly 4% premium of value stocks compared to growth stocks. The authors find a diminished premium: 2.1%% yearly for the longest average period and 2.5% yearly from 2000 to 2016. Additionally, they warn that the value premium can come in erratic patterns. (see here for more info)
- The concept of the momentum effect was introduced by Jegadeesh and Titman(1993) documenting a monthly 1% premium of past winning stocks compared to past losing stocks. The authors find a fairly consistent premium: 0.71% monthly for the longest average period and 0.79% monthly from 2000 to 2016.
Why does it matter?
In general, the issue of data-mining may contaminate the statistical results from backtesting that underlie factor investing. The use of out-of-sample universes to test results obtained with US-only data sets is an important advance in testing the robustness of various factors and the associated return performance.
- Based on this research, the size premium is lower than originally thought. However, after considering the risks, illiquidity and transaction costs of investing in small-cap stocks, there at least seem to be no case to underweight them.
- The value premium has been lower in the US than originally documented. Outside the US, it is stronger and more persistent.
- With the caveat that momentum premium can go through periods of substantial underperformance and drawdowns, it (in the words of the authors) “can generate a disturbingly large abnormal return.”
The Most Important Chart From the Paper:
Elisabetta Basilico, Ph.D., CFA, (@ebasilico) is an independent investment consultant. With co-author Tommi Johnsen, PhD, she is writing an upcoming book on research backed investing. You can learn more at http://academicinsightsoninvesting.com/
Note: This site provides NO information on our value investing ETFs or our momentum investing ETFs. Please refer to this site.
Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.
Please remember that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Please read our full disclosures. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. This material has been provided to you solely for information and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The factual information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed by the author and Alpha Architect to be reliable but it is not necessarily all-inclusive and is not guaranteed as to its accuracy and is not to be regarded as a representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor should the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission from Alpha Architect.
Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom)