Daily Academic Alpha: Estimation Investigations

Daily Academic Alpha: Estimation Investigations

March 18, 2015 Uncategorized
Print Friendly
(Last Updated On: January 18, 2017)

Separating the Wheat from the Chaff: Identifying the Signal and Predictable Error Components of Target Price Forecasts

A target price forecast scaled by current price provides the analyst’s assessment of the implied return to that stock over the stated forecast horizon. Using a simple valuation framework, we show that implied returns are a function of the expected dividend distribution, analysts’ private information that is not yet reflected in prices, and errors with respect to forecasting cash flows and the discount rate. We provide empirical evidence consistent with implied returns being correlated with proxies for these factors and that analysts make systematic errors with respect to valuation inputs. We further show that job-related incentives impact analysts’ valuations over and above the theoretical inputs. We investigate whether investors distinguish the signal and predictable bias components of implied returns. We find that the signal component is positively related to future returns over short windows (up to two months), while the bias component is negatively related to future stock returns over the six and twelve-month horizon. These results suggest that investors incorporate the signal component fairly quickly into prices, but take time to correct prices for the predictable bias in implied returns.

Conditionally Conservative Fair Value Measurements

We investigate whether firms’ measurements of the fair values of financial instruments based on Level 2 and 3 inputs other than active market prices for those instruments exhibit conditional conservatism (i.e., timelier recognition of unrealized losses than gains). We estimate conditional conservatism using an expansion of Basu’s (1997) reverse regression model that decomposes the dependent variable comprehensive income into the parts attributable to fair value measurements versus other measurement bases and that interacts the returns-related explanatory variables with the proportions of assets that are financial instruments with fair values measured using Level 2 and 3 versus Level 1 inputs. We find firms with more Level 2 and 3, but not Level 1, fair value measurements exhibit more conditionally conservative comprehensive income attributable to those measurements but not to other measurement bases. We further find that this increase is larger for firms with poorer information environments and for years following rather than during the financial crisis and following rather than preceding the effective date of SFAS 157. To explore the generalizability of these findings to non-financial assets, we conduct similar analysis on oil and gas firms’ measurements akin to the fair value of their reserves, obtaining consistent results. Overall, our results indicate that firms report conditionally conservative fair value measurements when market imperfections enable them to exercise discretion over those measurements, consistent with firms attempting to attain the well-documented contracting and other benefits of conditional conservatism (e.g., Watts 2003).

Note: This site provides no information on our value investing ETFs or our momentum investing ETFs. Please refer to this site.

Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.

Please remember that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Please read our full disclaimer. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. This material has been provided to you solely for information and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The factual information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed by the author and Alpha Architect to be reliable but it is not necessarily all-inclusive and is not guaranteed as to its accuracy and is not to be regarded as a representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor should the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission from Alpha Architect.

About the Author

Wesley R. Gray, Ph.D.

After serving as a Captain in the United States Marine Corps, Dr. Gray received a PhD, and was a finance professor at Drexel University. Dr. Gray’s interest in entrepreneurship and behavioral finance led him to found Alpha Architect. Dr. Gray has published three books: EMBEDDED: A Marine Corps Adviser Inside the Iraqi Army, QUANTITATIVE VALUE: A Practitioner’s Guide to Automating Intelligent Investment and Eliminating Behavioral Errors, and DIY FINANCIAL ADVISOR: A Simple Solution to Build and Protect Your Wealth. His numerous published works has been highlighted on CBNC, CNN, NPR, Motley Fool, WSJ Market Watch, CFA Institute, Institutional Investor, and CBS News. Dr. Gray earned an MBA and a PhD in finance from the University of Chicago and graduated magna cum laude with a BS from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.