Quantitative Momentum Research: Short-Term Return Reversal
Last updated on January 18th, 2017 at 01:58 pm
Fads, Martingales, and Market Efficiency
- A version of the paper can be found here.
- Want a summary of academic papers with alpha? Check out our Academic Research Recap Category.
Predictable variation in equity returns might reflect either (1) predictable changes in expected returns or (2) market inefficiency and stock price “overreaction.” These explanations can be distinguished by examining returns over short time intervals since systematic changes in fundamental valuation over intervals like a week should not occur in efficient markets. The evidence suggests that the “winners” and “losers” one week experience sizable return reversals the next week in a way that reflects apparent arbitrage profits which persist after corrections for bid-ask spreads and plausible transactions costs. This probably reflects inefficiency in the market for liquidity around large changes.
Lehmann(1990) rejects the efficient markets hypothesis (EMH) by pointing out that stock prices exhibit short-term intervals (weekly horizon).
Lehmann(1990) shows there are short-term arbitrage opportunities using momentum. The main findings are as follows:
- “Winners” and “Losers” experience sizable return reversals the next week.
- Table II shows that portfolios of securities that had positive returns (winners) in the prior week typically had negative returns in the next week (-0.35% to -0.55% per week on average), while those with negative returns (losers) in the prior week typically had positive returns in the next week (0.86% to 1.24% per week on average).
- “Contrarian strategies” (buying past losers and selling past winners) generate abnormal returns of over 2% per month.
Overall, Lehmann (1990) believes that investors’ cognitive bias lead to market inefficiency and short-term return reversals.
Similar with Lehmann (1990), Jegadeesh (1990) also demonstrates the short-term reversal effect (monthly horizon).
This finding (and Jegadeesh 1990) is why academics generally use 2-12 momentum (last 12-month returns, excluding the previous month) when examining intermediate-term momentum (last 12-month returns) effect on stock prices.
Note: This site provides no information on our value investing ETFs or our momentum investing ETFs. Please refer to this site.
Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.
Please remember that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Please read our full disclaimer. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. This material has been provided to you solely for information and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The factual information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed by the author and Alpha Architect to be reliable but it is not necessarily all-inclusive and is not guaranteed as to its accuracy and is not to be regarded as a representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor should the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission from Alpha Architect.