Mythbuster: Are women more talkative than men?

Mythbuster: Are women more talkative than men?

July 31, 2014 Research Insights
Print Friendly
(Last Updated On: January 18, 2017)

Using sociometers to quantify social interaction patterns

Note: this is not related to finance, but a fun study we found while perusing economic and behavioral psychology journals.

Abstract:

Research on human social interactions has traditionally relied on self-reports. Despite their widespread use, self-reported accounts of behaviour are prone to biases and necessarily reduce the range of behaviours, and the number of subjects, that may be studied simultaneously. The development of ever smaller sensors makes it possible to study group-level human behaviour in naturalistic settings outside research laboratories. We used such sensors, sociometers, to examine gender, talkativeness and interaction style in two different contexts. Here, we find that in the collaborative context, women were much more likely to be physically proximate to other women and were also significantly more talkative than men, especially in small groups. In contrast, there were no gender-based differences in the non-collaborative setting. Our results highlight the importance of objective measurement in the study of human behaviour, here enabling us to discern context specific, gender-based differences in interaction style.

Alpha Highlight:

Do women sit around and gossip in the cafeteria, while men only talk when it matters?

Are these stereotypes true or do we (i.e., men) suffer from availability bias, overconfidence, group think, and a whole slew of additional biases?

The authors in this paper examine the gender differences in talkativeness using electronic instrumentation (Sociometers) rather than human observers (surveys and questionnaires). To be specific, “Sociometers” are wearable devices that use high-frequency radio transmitter to collect detailed information on social interactions. Using machine can help improve accuracy (Check “Machine vs. Experts” category to read more articles).

The paper designs two settings and assesses participants’ communication behaviors:

  • Setting 1 — Collaborative setting: 79 students (42 males, 37 females) were required to process a large quantity of sophisticated readings and they are allowed to communicate to each other. The performance of the students in the exercise would affect their final course grades.
  • Setting 2 — Non-collaborative setting: 54 co-located employees (16 males and 38 females) were studied during 12 one-hour lunch breaks (typically in a cafeteria and in small groups).

In panel A below, there is evidence that women are more talkative than men in collaborative settings where results matter.

In panel C, there is no evidence for gender-based differences in talkativeness where results don’t matter.

2014-07-21 16_41_24-Using sociometers to quantify social interaction patterns.pdf - Adobe Reader
The results are hypothetical results and are NOT an indicator of future results and do NOT represent returns that any investor actually attained. Indexes are unmanaged, do not reflect management or trading fees, and one cannot invest directly in an index. Additional information regarding the construction of these results is available upon request.

Overall, the evidence shows no support for the traditional stereotype that women gossip around the water cooler all day while the men do the “important” talking. In fact, the evidence suggests that women engage in conversation when it actually matters–which is probably the optimal thing to do if you want to get things done.

Another reason why women will eventually rule the world (if they don’t already)…

 


Note: This site provides NO information on our value investing ETFs or our momentum investing ETFs. Please refer to this site.


Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.


Please remember that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Please read our full disclosures. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. This material has been provided to you solely for information and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The factual information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed by the author and Alpha Architect to be reliable but it is not necessarily all-inclusive and is not guaranteed as to its accuracy and is not to be regarded as a representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor should the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission from Alpha Architect.


Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom)




About the Author

Wesley R. Gray, Ph.D.

After serving as a Captain in the United States Marine Corps, Dr. Gray earned a PhD, and worked as a finance professor at Drexel University. Dr. Gray’s interest in bridging the research gap between academia and industry led him to found Alpha Architect, an asset management that delivers affordable active exposures for tax-sensitive investors. Dr. Gray has published four books and a number of academic articles. Wes is a regular contributor to multiple industry outlets, to include the following: Wall Street Journal, Forbes, ETF.com, and the CFA Institute. Dr. Gray earned an MBA and a PhD in finance from the University of Chicago and graduated magna cum laude with a BS from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.


  • Eric Meier

    I think I see this in physics research. Maybe men tend to fear showing weakness in open discussion, letting pride get in the way of progress. I will keep this information from my wife!