Biased Analysts Create Big Profits?
‘Consistent’ Earnings Surprises
- Hwang, Liu, and Lou
- A version of the paper can be found here.
- Want a summary of academic papers with alpha? Check out our Academic Research Recap Category!
We hypothesize that analysts with a bullish stock recommendation have an interest in not being subsequently contradicted by negative firm-specific news. As a result, these analysts report downward-biased earnings forecasts so that the company is less likely to experience a negative earnings surprise. Analogously, analysts with a bearish recommendation report upward biased earnings forecasts so that the firm is less likely to experience a strong positive earnings surprise. Consistent with this notion, we find that stock recommendations significantly and positively predict subsequent earnings surprises, as well as narrow beats versus narrow misses. This predictability is concentrated in situations where the motivation for such behavior is particularly strong. Stock recommendations also predict earnings-announcement-day returns. A long-short portfolio that exploits this predictability earns abnormal returns of 125 basis points per month.
The paper documents that analysts with a bullish recommendation walk down their EPS growth estimates (creating a positive surprise). For analysts with a bearish recommendation, EPS growth estimates are too high (creating a negative surprise). The paper shows this in the figure below:
Is there a way to take advantage of this? The paper recommends the following trading strategy:
From page 23 and 24:
To better assess the economic magnitude of our finding, we employ the following calendar-time portfolio approach: We sort earnings announcements into two groups based on the consensus recommendation prior to the earnings announcement. On any given trading day, we purchase stocks that have a strong buy/buy consensus recommendation and that are announcing earnings in three trading days (i.e., we purchase stocks at time t=-3, where t=0 is the earnings announcement day or the next trading day if earnings are announced on a non-trading day; “long leg”). We short stocks that have a hold/underperform/sell consensus recommendation and that are announcing earnings in three trading days (“short leg”). Each stock is kept in the long/short-portfolio for seven trading days (i.e., until t=+3). If on any given day, there are less than or equal to 10 stocks on either the long or short side, we hold the 3-month Treasury bill instead of the long-short portfolio (this is the case for less than 5% of the trading days).
As shown below, this strategy produces significant monthly alphas (at 5% and 10% levels):
150bps x 12 months = some SERIOUS annual alpha!
Note: This site provides no information on our value investing ETFs or our momentum investing ETFs. Please refer to this site.
Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.
Please remember that past performance is not an indicator of future results. Please read our full disclaimer. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. This material has been provided to you solely for information and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer or any advice or recommendation to purchase any securities or other financial instruments and may not be construed as such. The factual information set forth herein has been obtained or derived from sources believed by the author and Alpha Architect to be reliable but it is not necessarily all-inclusive and is not guaranteed as to its accuracy and is not to be regarded as a representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor should the attached information serve as the basis of any investment decision. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission from Alpha Architect.